Start hereWhere Regent sits

Where Regent sits

On every rail the shape is the same: the decision happens before money moves, the amount and the counterparty are read from the rail rather than from the agent wherever the rail can name them, and the rail’s own outcome closes the decision in the receipt. What differs is the exact point where the decision is taken and who reports the outcome.

RailThe decision is taken…Amount and payee come fromWhat closes the decisionStatus
Stripe through the Cloud Gatewaybefore the request reaches Stripe; the gateway holds the Stripe key, the agent never doesthe request itself, per Stripe path: amount on payment intents and charges, the line items of a checkout session, destination on transfers, the owner’s bank on payouts; refunds count as money leaving (the operations map)Stripe’s answer to that call; receipt settlement_source: providerLive
Agentcard (the owner’s own card at US merchants)between the cart and the confirm: Agentcard reports the cart, Regent decides on its total, the confirm carries the decided amount as a ceiling Agentcard enforcesAgentcard: the cart total and the store id, never the agentAgentcard’s order events (placed, confirmed, failed, cancelled); receipt settlement_source: providerLive; sandbox cards in sandbox organizations
Any HTTP API through the gateway or the sidecarbefore the call; the credential is injected after an allowthe tool’s declared sources (payee_from, the amount field); a tool that cannot name them fails closedthe provider’s response, or the agent’s /complete recorded as the agent’s reportLive
Your own servers (sidecar)in the data path, as a proxy the agent talks to; the agent reaches nothing elsesame as abovesame as aboveLive
Custody co-sign (a custodian signs a transfer only after Regent’s decision)before the custodian signs: the custodian asks Regent about the transfer, signs on allow, refuses otherwisethe transfer request at the custodian: amount, asset, destination addressthe on-chain transaction the custodian reports, verified on the chain; receipt settlement_source: custodian, settlement_ref the transaction hash, settlement_network the chainPilot with a custody provider
Budget envelope (AAuth Budgets)before the first call: a slice of the mandate is issued as a budget token the resource meters itselfthe token’s budget claim; the resource’s own meteringthe resource’s usage readingLive at get4agent.com (Budget envelopes)
Card issuer or processor pre-authorizationat authorization time, before the issuer approvesthe authorization messagethe issuer’s signed settlement confirmationPublished contract, no issuer wired yet: below

Two rules hold on every row. The agent never names its own counterparty when the rail can (payee_source: rail in the receipt says which happened), and an outcome the rail did not report is a decision left open, never a success assumed (Latency and failure).

What an issuer or processor would wire

The contract below is what we ask of an issuer or processor, published so that the first integration is a configuration exercise rather than a design meeting. It is the same contract the custody pilot runs on, with card vocabulary.

The hook. A synchronous call from the authorization path, before the issuer’s approval, carrying:

FieldRequiredNotes
amount, currencyyesminor units follow the currency’s decimals
merchant.name, merchant.mccyesthe payee; the MCC lets a mandate cap by category
auth_referenceyesthe issuer’s id for this authorization; it becomes the idempotency key
card_referenceyesa token or last four plus a stable id; never the PAN
agent_id or a card-to-agent bindingyeswhich agent this card is bound to
merchant.country, channeloptionalfacts a policy may key on

The answer, within the network’s own window (Regent answers in well under a second; set your timeout and decide in advance what a timeout means — we recommend a decline): allow, deny or escalate with a decision_id, the refusal code when there is one, and on an allow a signed token the issuer may keep with the authorization.

Settlement. When the transaction clears, the issuer signs a settlement confirmation over decision_id, status, amount and currency (a JWS, Ed25519, ES256 or RS256, with a JWKS the issuer publishes) and posts it to Regent. Regent embeds it in the receipt. From then on the receipt says what the issuer says, under the issuer’s key, and a chargeback is argued from one document both sides can verify.

What the issuer never sends. The PAN, the CVV, the cardholder’s name or address. The receipt carries the rail’s references; it has no field for any of these (what is never in a receipt).